i'm not ready to post an answer, but my gut response is:
anarchism may have some inherent relationship with/dependence upon a revolution, i have no idea. but my anarchy does not, and i choose to live anarchically as much as possible in this pre-atr world.
revolutions, as best i can perceive, simply modify positions and dynamics of power. the very concept, imo, implies an acceptance of mass society as fundamental to the human condition, and mass action as fundamental to liberation from authoritarian relations. neither of which i agree with.
i guess i presume that revolution requires mass, coordinated effort of some sort. i would be open to hearing of completely different forms of revolution that do not require (or even allow) that approach.
all that said, if shit busted out in some revolutionary explosion, i would surely find my own ways to participate.