This is a good question, if for no other reason than the irrational flutter around the personality - which is completely removed from the value of his writings.
Personally, (and that isn't worth much), i've relegated him to the ranks of the 'old men with grey beards'. Some of what he says is interesting, but much is dated, or myopic, and mostly relevant to the times in which it was written (that is to say, it did'nt age well).
When i read his writings, i'm inclined to pat him on the head, and tell him 'it'll be all right'. Then go burn something down, 'cause i was so inclined anyway.