What if it is for the mutual good rather than the common good. We all are not the same so why not have a system or systems that work for each person rather than each person having to fit in a system. Lets say there are systems that allow anyone to do whatever they want with or without any conveniences available. I am not defining those systems. Systems work according to the purpose and parameters of their design. Systems could be designed that only provided maintain certain benefits without crossing over into personal preference or conviction.
We do not have to get long or need to like each other, but have an understanding that by you having is what you determine as good for you allows me to have what I determine as good for me. I think that it is a false notion that people must agree in order to have order. That is because our minds still think that a majority must rule or determine what is beat for others. Seemingly even most anarchist wish to bring the world to anarchy because that is their personal preference and conviction.
Let me present probably a really stupid example. Currently highways are an affective means of transportation. I like a nice four lane highway all vehicles traveling at various constant speeds in the same direction. Others like a highway where anyone can travel in any lane at whatever speed a person wants. Maybe though t times that person may want a safer and less challenging trip maybe with their family, maybe I at times want the thrill of the other highway. Users are able to pick the route they want. Both allow both systems to exist by allowing others the choice of personal preference.
What if a person wants to drive against traffic in the four lane highway. This certainly could happen but still maybe others could be warned and just pull over till the other driver passes.
Actually a world with such systems would allow anyone to live they way they wanted. If we have no such systems and live in total chaos options would offer less choices and actually become harder to live a self-determined lifestyle. In time there would be no roads, no technology. Life would likely be hard, where attaining water, food, and supplies becomes our main objective in life and creativity, abstract thought, self expression would be frivolous and a waste of time. The thing we enjoy and bring us comfort become non-existent in time.
Do you have a favorite website, movie, music group, book, chair, pen, park, phone, place to eat or choice of dinner, drink, hobby, musical instrument, clothes, even group of friends. These are not the works of society but of people who benefit from the creative work of other people. There is nothing that stops us from just walking away from these and living in a forest or wilderness. But if they are lost they will be gone.
Systems do not need to depend on society, government, or money. We just have to take those things out of the systems.