I was wondering if anarchists thought the state was undermining their subversive efforts? A great deal of analysis, from a variety of sources, suggests that the very geography of many cities of today is being manipulated with the idea of removing spots that foster riots and unrest. The use of an informant allows far deeper infiltration while the lack of a more complex anarchist strength prevents the threat of retaliation coming against informants and those turned to inform, to snitch, on their fellows. The distractions from the various media: television, internet, radio, billboards, posters and so on, which both reinforce the values of society and frames the narratives of its rebels, shaping the perception of them. The transforming of riots and unrest into situations of national conversation, rather than a challenge to the system, the media even can make an insurrection into a political stunt.
Is there any strong anarchist analyses that discuss how these forces work against anarchists and give suggestions for where subversion may need to go should any mass strategy become easily herded?
tl;dr I often hear things about doing stuff and things about how dominated we are, but not how anarchist things are dominated and how anarchists can overcome them, if that is a better way to frame what I'm trying to say.
