it seems to me the left has historically been entirely antagonistic to revolt, and the possibility of anarchy, communism or whatever. im sure most who frequent this site would agree but perhaps not. But i was always confused by the label post-left. is there a difference between being anti-left and post-left. if so, should one who deems the left a counter-revolutionary recuperating force assume the an anti-left position? have there been people to critique post-leftism because the analysis coming out of the tendency did not go far enough?
edited for tags