Rather than talking about which aspects of normal society are compatible with anarchist philosophy/ideology, I wonder if the human race and the earth are compatible with the things that modern anarchists want.
This contemplation goes back to the green anarchist argument that civilization is the main cause of pandemics, not viruses and bacteria. It's really hard to argue with this point of view if you look at it with an open mind: how would people be getting epidemically infected by COVID if it wasn't for airplanes and cities? Without those two things, clearly some people would die, but not all at once like is happening now, and the virus itself would go extinct.
As somewhat of a tangent, I also wonder if having a rapidly transient society or culture is in any way compatible with the goals that anarchists want to accomplish. My theory as to why COVID is such a huge problem in the US is:
-people are always coming and going through any means necessary
-the US is kind of a "melting pot", that despite its violent white-christian roots, people who are not often really like to come to the US for various reasons...
Of course, you could have something like bolos, where nomads are a thing, yet given the amount of space that human's take up, i think that having communes and "going back to the land" are waaay more capable of changing the earth to our advantage...You don't even have to buy land, you could have anarchists living in the woods who moonlight with everyone else. There's still so much land that is not occupied by humans. Avoiding participating by not working or contributing money to the things that destroy so many other things seems like the golden standard for any sort of lifestyle.
This is about as far as I can go as an anarchist visionary! Please help me! I don't want to be working at the anarchist-federation power plant!