Login
Register
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Users
Ask a Question
About Us
Welcome to Anarchy101 Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers about
anarchism
from other members of the community.
And what about egoist anarchists who take liberty of others ?
0
votes
Why, an egoist anarchist will restrain himself for taking liberties of others ?
asked
9 months
ago
by
anonymous
related to an answer for:
what is egosit anarchism
what does it mean, exactly, to "take the liberty of others"? like...restrain them? take their shit? give them a lobotomy? please...curious minds reel...
—
9 months
ago
by
D. Cresencia
(
370
points)
3 Answers
–3
votes
One answer is that they won't restrain themselves. Some egoists can be pretty anti-social, to the point of being hostile to others. These people often don't actually identify as egoists, they are merely people who do whatever they want regardless of others.
Another answer is because they want to restrain themselves. There is nothing to stop an egoist from taking the liberty of others, unless the egoist is worried about charges of hypocrisy, which consistent egoists should not be. It may well be that egoists decide they don't want to take the liberty of others, at least not other types of anarchist who they may see as allies in the fight against control.
That said, I'm not an egoist, so not best placed to answer.
answered
9 months
ago
by
Buenaventura
(
240
points)
+1
vote
Why would any person ever restrain themselves from taking the liberty of others? Egoists are no different from anyone else. We are all motivated, on some level, by the drive for self-preservation.
With that in mind, it often doesn't make sense to "take the liberty" of others, especially amongst anarchists (who are generally hostile to those who take liberty from them), as the negative consequences are likely to be bigger than the benefit. Why be a tyrant? It's actually just too much work, in my opinion.
that said, I don't particularly define myself as an egoist, so this might not be the best answer ever.
answered
9 months
ago
by
ingrate
(
9,510
points)
–1
vote
Stirner proposed the "Union of Egoists" specifically as a strategy of horizontal association, and emphasized things like the selfishness of playful joy together and becoming self-determining rather than that of enslaving people. Of course there are authoritarian egoists, but, an egoist anarchist specifically does not want to become the new spook or shackle of another.
answered
9 months
ago
by
Autumn Leaf Cascade
(
9,050
points)
Related questions
+3
votes
2
answers
If anarchists dont believe in the authority of the state, why would the SF anarchist bookfair orgainzers collect evidence about a pieing to hand over to someone who called the cops and is pressing charges?
asked
3 years
ago
by
anonymous
practice
snitching
hypocrites
0
votes
2
answers
What is the best most effective immediate direct action that North American anarchists can take in response to the unfolding ecological nightmare in the Gulf of Mexico?
asked
2 years
ago
by
anonymous
environment
corporate
pathology
executive
accountability
+2
votes
1
answer
What is it about the formal and/or authoritarian organizing of radicals that lends itself to state infiltration?
asked
1 month
ago
by
anonymous
organisation
post-left
activism
security-culture
+2
votes
1
answer
what is good about the broadness of the definiton of anarchist? and what
asked
3 years
ago
by
anonymous
conflict
contradictions
–4
votes
3
answers
What do anarchists think about Ron Paul and libertarianism in general?
asked
4 months
ago
by
wanderlust misfit
(
270
points)
anarchism
libertarianism
ron-paul
small-government
minarchism